ETS contradictions render it climatically ineffective.

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

ETS contradictions render it climatically ineffective.

Subject: ETS contradictions render it climatically ineffective.
To: Editorial/ RadioNews <ninetonoon@radionz.co.nz>

All trading systems that involve the allocation of large quantities of free emissions rights by the state to business and agriculture[delayed or otherwise] are prone to a fundamental contradiction, the inequitable burden renders such systems climatically ineffective. Contraction and Convergence, which involves a nominal or theoretical egalitarian pre-distribution of private property rights in the earth's carbon cycling capacity, overcomes some of the political difficulties associated with trading systems that rely on 'grandfathering' of rights. Contraction and Convergence was ommited from the MfE consulations but still remains the only baseline upon which all other proposals including ETS can be measured against. (see www.gci.org.uk )

Blair Anderson  ‹(•¿•)›

Social Ecologist 'at large'
http://blair4mayor.com
ph (643) 389 4065   cell 027 265 7219

--
Blair Anderson  ‹(•¿•)›

Social Ecologist 'at large'
http://mildgreens.blogspot.com
http://blairformayor.blogspot.com
http://blair4mayor.com
http://efsdp.org

ph (643) 389 4065   cell 027 265 7219

No comments:

Post a Comment

the Challenge of Reason

Send the signal to the top of the table.

In the civic dialog surrounding leadership for Christchurch being largely mediated by the hard copy editors of the forth estate, new media; the internet, is the natural vehicle for independent thinking, participation and coordination. (ie: see http://canterburyissues.org.nz/)

The 2007 local body elections Christchurch will 'mandate' a direction for the cities foreseable future from the collective fog of signals it sends in electing the head of the Council table.

Such is your mayoral vote. Your vote for reason is a vote for rating equity, for affordable and accessable services and for intergenerational equity; [and more].

If you wish to cast a vote that will deliver beyond 'business as usual' outcomes then consider;

The writer's 30 years of examination of our drug laws has evolved into a comprehensive, long-term effort to bring about meaningful reform of drug policy on many levels. The principal objectives of this effort are:

reductions in crime and public disorder; improvement of the public health; better protection of children; and wiser use of scarce public resources.

Are these worthy aspirations? Worthy of the future Mayor of Christchurch?

It was these very aspirations that sent Seattle drug policy law proponent Roger Goodman of the King County Bar Association to the Washington State Senate. Seattle, Our Sister City, is away ahead of us here in Canterbury, (despite Mayor Moore's 'Time to Talk').

I see my symbolic stand for Mayor as raising awareness of the uncivil consequences of drug prohibition and all that represents.

Send YOUR signal to the top of the table.

Vote Blair4Mayor.comraising awareness of the consequences of drug prohibition and just about everything else others are either (a) intellectualy bereft or (b) compromised by affiliation to discuss.

Time to Talk, Time to Vote.....

Blair Anderson, on the hustings 'canvassing for opinion'

Wednesday, April 30, 2008